Connect with us

News

What Will It Take to Regulate Crypto Exchanges?

Published

on

Konstantinos Stylianou is an assistant professor at the University of Leeds School of Law, and a visiting scientist at the Brown University Department of Computer Science.


Shortly after Bitcoin SV was delisted from Binance, CoinDesk advisor Michael Casey published an insightful op-ed discussing whether the delisting amounted to censorship (it doesn’t), whether exchanges should be held to high standards of neutrality (they should) and whether regulation is necessary to achieve this result (it is).

The idea is that because major exchanges play such a crucial role in the industry (Casey claims that “[t]hey are the cryptocurrency industry) they should not be allowed to arbitrarily discriminate between crypto assets — rather they should be regulated to operate as neutral platforms.

But ask any regulation expert and they will tell you that, absent Goldilocks conditions (hold that thought), neutrality is neither the natural state of markets, nor the natural instinct of regulators.

If that’s the case, regulation of the kind that would have saved Bitcoin SV and of the kind Casey advocates for – while possible – might not quite be around the corner.

Neutrality is rare and regulation even rarer

That neutrality is not the natural state of markets, we’ve known for a while.

It is hard to notice when there is an abundance of choice and people get what they want, but when there is too little of something, the owner of that bottleneck resource often becomes partial and does not treat everyone the same.

When the first telephone networks were rolled out, they suppressed devices and services from competitors and even arbitrarily refused call service. Microsoft saw Netscape as a threat and sabotaged it. Apple and AT&T similarly blocked Skype in the early days of the iPhone. There are countless other examples of platforms disfavoring complements or customers.

Were regulators called in to save the day in all these cases? They were indeed. Telephone networks were designated as common carriers, which came with the obligation to provide non-discriminatory service; Microsoft was forced by antitrust regulators to abandon the practices that squeezed Netscape out of the market; and Apple and AT&T dropped their restrictions against Skype after the Federal Communications Commission threatened them with net neutrality action.

It may seem that regulation came to the rescue whenever necessary to restore neutrality. But the truth is that despite occasional corrections, neutrality still remains the exception in the market and in regulatory action.

Part of the reason is that the law actually acknowledges that non-neutrality is not all that bad. The ability to deviate from uniform practice is what allows companies to differentiate themselves in the market. Not all grocery stores carry the same products, neither do they all place them in the exact same shelf, and this helps consumers and producers address diversified needs.

Even extreme differentiation, like exclusive agreements that make a business proposition unique in the market, can be good. For example, Nintendo’s exclusive console agreements helped bootstrap an entire industry by tying popular games to Nintendo’s consoles thereby increasing competition.

It is not that this kind of discriminatory practices have no downsides. Far from it. But it is also a standard assumption in modern market-driven economies is that regulation distorts markets too, and therefore, the enactment of rules requires proof that, left alone, the market would perform demonstrably worse.

In the mind of a regulator

To decide whether Binance, or any exchange for that matter, should be neutral and not discriminate against crypto assets (be it cryptocurrencies, crypto derivatives or other), regulators would consider a number of factors.

Power

The most decisive factor to regulate is sustained monopoly power or dominance in the market.

Regulators usually impose neutrality on platforms because users and/or complements (read: cryptocurrencies) can’t or realistically won’t turn to alternative platforms, which would allow the dominant platform to exploit them.

If Binance were a monopoly exchange, then delisting a cryptocurrency would result in driving it out of the market. Or, if the cost of switching from Binance to another exchange was prohibitively high, then, similarly, Binance users and listed cryptocurrencies would be trapped by Binance’s choices.

But neither of those conditions are true here. There are numerous exchanges on which Bitcoin SV can be traded, and signing up with Binance does not preclude users from trading on other exchanges too. In other words, both Bitcoin SV and users multi-home.

In that sense, Bitcoin SV is not in the same position as companies listed on NYSE or Nasdaq, because by and large, companies are listed on only one exchange, and delisting them would mean that they cease to be publicly traded.

Harm and market distortion

Regardless of power, would decisions such as Binance’s delisting of Bitcoin SV undermine important public interest goals such as market stability and efficiency, consumer and investor protection, and capital formation?

Regulation is more likely if the problematic conduct threatens harm to public interest goals, is frequent, and has long-lasting effects without second-best alternatives being able to contain them.

At the moment, the picture is still fluid. For one thing, regulators still grapple with the question of whether crypto assets even form part of financial markets. If they do not, then there would be no legal basis to subject exchanges to financial regulation.

Assuming that they do, the frequency of the problematic conduct matters too. Crypto delisting is not unheard of but it is not exactly common either. There is no exact formula to calculate a threshold. In the case of network neutrality rules, fewer than five instances were enough to set the regulatory process in motion, whereas for privacy, numerous and repeated instances by tech giants have not resulted in regulation yet.

We also don’t know the extent of the harm of delisting. When the trading of conventional securities is suspended, they effectively disappear from the market, perhaps permanently. On the other hand, despite Bitcoin SV’s delisting from Binance, it still traded on another seven exchanges.

To be sure, Bitcoin SV’s price suffered significantly upon the announcement of the delisting on April 15 (from $73 on April 14 to $55 on April 15), and the effects to its medium-long term liquidity and reputation are yet to be accounted for (likely bleak).

This, in turn, can have severe consequences for investors’ financial situation.

But regulation is concerned with broad effects, not individual actors. The key lies less in the fate of Bitcoin SV specifically, and more in the effect of the practice of delisting in the overall stability of the market. It is a very different situation if delisting is regarded as a normal business practice whose risk is acceptably assumed by investors, and if delisting is regarded as serving no other purpose but to manipulate the market or to defraud investors. Only the latter could invite regulation.

Information inadequacies

The market can only work efficiently if all parties are sufficiently well informed to evaluate their options.

If investors had perfect information, then their reactions to Bitcoin SV’s delisting would reflect their up-to-date assessment, and there would be no need for regulation to protect them from anything. Any price, reputation and liquidity fluctuations would correspond to investors’ full and accurate beliefs and manipulation by Binance would be impossible.

This is clearly not the case here or in any other market. Perfect information is one of the most unrealistic assumptions of neoclassical economics in modern economies.

But the obvious solution to information inadequacies is more information and more transparency, not neutrality. The difference is that transparency enables actors to make a (presumably better) choice, whereas neutrality is a choice itself: it mandates a specific treatment (i.e. non-discrimination).

Regulators would normally want to start with the least onerous measure (transparency). If it is not effective, they can escalate to neutrality. If still ineffective, they may even dictate the rules of listing and delisting themselves.

Unequal bargaining power and anticompetitive conduct

The main idea behind non-regulated competitive markets is that actors behave well because market forces discipline them. If, however, the competitive forces exercised by competitors (other exchanges), complements (cryptoassets) or customers (investors) are weak, market players (exchanges) are unconstrained to act in ways that harm others.

Think about how much more difficult it would be for an exchange to delist Bitcoin with its much higher market capitalization, velocity and liquidity compared to Bitcoin SV.

Evidently, Bitcoin is more valuable to exchanges and therefore the constraints around how exchanges treat it are tighter. In reality, the majority of cryptocurrencies are nowhere near as important as Bitcoin, and the fact that they are not backed by unified institutional actors further diminishes their bargaining power.

Large investors could have a similar constraining effect, since exchanges would not want to lose investors who can generate large volumes.

For this to work it would mean that cryptocurrency ownership is concentrated in large investors (there is evidence in that direction, for example 42 percent of Bitcoin is owned by the top 0.01 of addresses), but also that these investors are actually active and that churn is high or at least plausible.

Politics, politics, politics

The factors listed above leave out one important aspect of regulation: the fact that, ultimately, it is a political game, not an academic exercise. If politics favor regulation then that’s the most likely outcome regardless of how the factors listed above weigh in. We even have a fancy name for it: New Institutionalism.

As a function of the executive branch, regulation is subject to political pressure and revolves around interest groups. Nascent immature markets, such as that of cryptoassets, are usually captured by the interests of the existing regulatory authority and those of the public.

They are captured by the existing authority (in the US, this is the SEC) because they are already in the game and by extending their reach they justify their existence. Widened reach and heightened activity entitles them to more funding and higher rating. Just look at how everyone speaks of the European Commission as the global antitrust and privacy enforcer after having gone after Google and the like.

Nascent markets are also more likely to be regulated in the name of the public interest both because people are generally more vulnerable in new market contexts, and because industry interests have not developed lobbying capacity yet. This leaves the field clear to side with the public which is generally seen as the weaker side.

A few industry associations are already present in blockchain markets (EEA, PTDL, ISDA) but none seems to represent the collective interests of exchanges. On the contrary, regulatory interest and grassroots support for crypto assets seem stronger.

In the end, it is usually not a question of whether a market segment will be regulated or not; rather a question of how it will be regulated.

Coin in vice via Shutterstock

Continue Reading

News

Certified Closers Review

Avatar photo

Published

on

Certified Closers

I didn’t grow up in a picture-perfect home. Love, for me, was inconsistent…sometimes loud, sometimes distant, but never stable.

So I became obsessed with understanding it. Not the Hollywood version. The real stuff.

I spent years studying relationships…how they form, how they break, and what it takes to build ones that actually last.

Eventually, I became the person people called after the breakup. After the third fight in a week. Or when they were about to give up on love entirely.

That turned into coaching.

At first, just a few clients. Then more.

Then hundreds of people, all through word of mouth.

I was the coach people referred when nothing else worked. And I was good. Really good.

But here’s what no one tells you…

Being a great coach doesn’t automatically make you a great business owner.

I was still doing it all..coaching, content, sales calls, admin.

And I realized I was the bottleneck in my own business.

If I didn’t fix it, I’d burn out.

And worse…I’d limit how many people I could help.

That’s when a friend introduced me to James Sansone from Certified Closers.

She said, “If you’re serious about scaling this… he’s the best guy on the block.”

And she wasn’t lying.

The “villain” in this part of my story?

It was outdated systems, messy offers, and me trying to juggle everything without a clear path to grow.

I knew my coaching changed lives.

But I didn’t have a business model that matched the impact I was making.

James Sansone and the Certified Closers team

From day one, they brought clarity, structure, and firepower to my vision.

Here’s what they did:

Front-End Packaging:

They helped me niche down and build an offer so irresistible, my ideal clients felt like I was reading their mind. It wasn’t just a “coaching package” anymore…it was a solution they needed now.

Paid Ads Management:

They ran Facebook and Instagram campaigns that didn’t just get likes—they brought in leads who were actually ready to change their lives. Every dollar spent started working smarter, not harder.

Sales Process Optimization:

James refined my entire sales funnel. Every touchpoint, every follow-up, every conversation became intentional—and it showed in my conversion rates.

Automation & Scaling:

They automated the parts of my business that were draining my time. From lead nurturing to follow-up sequences, we set systems in place that freed me up to focus on coaching.

Removing Me from Daily Sales:

This was the biggest shift. James built a process that allowed me to step back from constant selling. Now, I’ve got a team in place and a system that converts—without me having to be on every single call.

Training & Development:

He didn’t just set it and forget it…his team trained my people, equipped them with proven sales strategies, and helped us lock in a high-performance culture.

With Certified Closers by my side, I transitioned from “coach with a gift” to “coach with a movement.”

We hit record months.

I finally had time to breathe.

And most importantly…I was impacting more lives than ever before.

My calendar isn’t chaos anymore.

I have freedom, consistent income, and scalable growth.

But most importantly, I’m living in alignment…doing what I love, while letting a world-class team handle the growth engine behind the scenes.

You can be brilliant at what you do…

But if your systems are broken, you’re capping your impact.

James Sansone and Certified Closers didn’t just help me scale.

They gave me my mission back, with more power behind it.

Now, every Friday, I pour a glass of wine, light a candle, and look at our client success board.

It’s covered in wins.

And I smile, because I know:

This isn’t just a business anymore.

It’s a legacy.

If you’re a coach, expert, or visionary trying to scale your brand I would suggest to stop doing it alone.

Get in touch with James Sansone and the Certified Closers team.

They don’t just close leads.

They open doors you didn’t even know were possible. That’s all I am going to say! 

Continue Reading

News

Final Drive Motors: An Essential Guide for Optimal Performance

Published

on

Final Drive Motors

Final drive motors are pivotal components in the machinery world, powering a wide array of equipment from excavators and bulldozers to heavy-duty vehicles. These motors are the backbone of any machine, providing the necessary torque and speed control to execute tasks efficiently. Understanding their operation, maintenance, and troubleshooting is crucial for maximizing performance and extending the lifespan of your machinery.

Understanding the Mechanics of Final Drive Motors

Final drive motors are designed to convert hydraulic power into mechanical energy, which in turn drives the wheels or tracks of heavy machinery. They are composed of a hydraulic motor and a reduction gearbox, working in tandem to reduce high-speed, low-torque hydraulic flow into low-speed, high-torque mechanical power. This process is essential for the heavy lifting, digging, and pushing operations that such machinery is tasked with.

Key Components and Their Functions

  • Hydraulic Motor: Acts as the initial receiver of hydraulic energy, converting it into rotational force.
  • Reduction Gearbox: Decreases the rotational speed while simultaneously increasing the torque.
  • Sprocket: Transfers the mechanical energy to the tracks or wheels, propelling the machine forward or backward.

Selecting the Right Final Drive Motor for Your Machinery

Choosing the correct final drive motor involves understanding your machinery’s requirements, including weight, load capacity, and the specific tasks it will perform. Factors such as the motor’s torque output, speed specifications, and compatibility with your machinery’s hydraulic system are critical in making an informed decision.

Compatibility and Installation

Ensuring your final drive motor is compatible with your machine’s make and model is paramount. Incorrect installation or incompatible parts can lead to inefficient operation, increased wear, and potential failure. Professional installation and calibration are recommended to achieve optimal performance and longevity.

Maintenance Tips for Long-Lasting Performance

Regular maintenance is key to extending the life of your final drive motor. This includes:

  • Routine Inspections: Regular checks for leaks, wear, and damage can prevent minor issues from becoming major problems.
  • Oil Changes: Changing the hydraulic fluid and filter as recommended by the manufacturer helps maintain hydraulic integrity and performance.
  • Cleaning: Keeping the motor and its components clean from dirt and debris prevents overheating and wear.

Troubleshooting Common Issues

Even with meticulous maintenance, final drive motors can encounter problems. Recognizing and addressing common issues promptly can save time and resources.

Leaks

Hydraulic fluid leaks are a frequent issue, often indicating worn seals or gaskets. Immediate attention is required to prevent further damage.

Noise

Unusual noises may signify internal wear or damage. A thorough inspection can identify the cause, whether it’s bearing failure or gear wear.

Reduced Performance

A drop in performance could be due to various factors, including hydraulic system issues, motor damage, or mechanical wear. Professional diagnostics are necessary to pinpoint and resolve the underlying cause.

The Future of Final Drive Motors

Advancements in technology are continuously shaping the development of final drive motors. Innovations in materials, design, and hydraulic systems are improving their efficiency, durability, and environmental impact. Staying informed about these advancements can help you make better decisions for your machinery and operations.

Conclusion

Final drive motors are indispensable components of heavy machinery, offering the power and control needed for various operations. Understanding their mechanics, ensuring proper selection and installation, and committing to regular maintenance can significantly enhance their performance and lifespan. By addressing any issues promptly and keeping abreast of technological advancements, machinery owners can ensure their equipment remains reliable and efficient for years to come.

Also check these: Best Final Drive Motor Suppliers

Continue Reading

News

Rejuvenate CBD Gummies: Unlocking Natural Healing for Optimal Wellness

Published

on

Rejuvenate CBD Gummies: Natural Solution for Health and Wellness

In a society where stress, pain, and a variety of health conditions are common, the search for a remedy that is both natural and effective becomes of the utmost importance. The Rejuvenate CBD Gummies have established themselves as a game-changing product by providing a novel strategy for maximizing one’s state of wellness. In this piece, we will go deeper into the extraordinary benefits and possibilities of Rejuvenate CBD Gummies, putting light on how they can alter your health and well-being. Rejuvenate CBD Gummies are a delicious way to get your daily dose of cannabidiol (CBD). Get ready to discover the hidden potential of natural remedies!

The Science Behind Rejuvenate CBD Gummies

Cannabidiol (CBD), a naturally occurring chemical that is present in the hemp plant, was used in the formulation of Rejuvenate CBD Gummies. CBD has been shown to have an effect on the endocannabinoid system, also known as the ECS. The ECS is a complex network of receptors that regulates a variety of human functions, including sleep, mood, the perception of pain, and immunological response. CBD has been shown to interact with the ECS. Rejuvenate CBD Gummies work to restore balance and harmony throughout the body by focusing on the endocannabinoid system (ECS).

A Holistic Approach to Wellness

In contrast to conventional pharmaceuticals, which frequently focus on treating a single problem at a time, the comprehensive approach to wellbeing offered by Rejuvenate CBD Gummies. These gummies address numerous facets of health at the same time, so improving total health rather than merely relieving specific symptoms. These gummies act in concert to bring relief from a wide range of symptoms, from bodily aches and pains to mental strain and anxiety.

Natural Ingredients, Powerful Results

The natural components used in the production of Rejuvenate CBD Gummies are chosen with great care to ensure the product’s high level of purity and efficacy. The following are some of the major components:

  1. Full-Spectrum Hemp Extract: This extract comes from hemp that was cultivated organically and is abundant in CBD as well as other cannabinoids that are good to the body. It is associated with a wide variety of health advantages, such as the alleviation of pain, the decrease of stress, and the promotion of general wellness.
  2. Terpenes and Flavonoids: These naturally occurring chemicals are important contributors to the entourage effect, which boosts the efficacy of CBD. They complement one another to increase the therapeutic capacity of the Rejuvenate CBD Gummies, which in turn results in a greater number of benefits.
  3. Natural Fruit Extracts: Natural fruit extracts are used in the production of Rejuvenate CBD Gummies, which allows for an explosion of scrumptious flavor. This assures that every bite will be a lovely and pleasurable experience for the consumer.

The Benefits of Rejuvenate CBD Gummies

  1. Pain Relief and Inflammation Reduction: CBD has been shown to have analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties, making Rejuvenate CBD Gummies an excellent choice for managing chronic pain, arthritis, and other inflammatory conditions.
  2. Stress and Anxiety Management: By interacting with receptors in the brain linked to mood regulation, CBD helps alleviate stress and anxiety. Rejuvenate CBD Gummies can promote a sense of calmness and relaxation, supporting mental well-being.
  3. Improved Sleep Quality: Many individuals struggle with sleep issues, whether it’s difficulty falling asleep or staying asleep throughout the night. Rejuvenate CBD Gummies can help regulate sleep patterns, promoting restful and rejuvenating sleep.
  4. Enhanced Focus and Clarity: CBD’s ability to interact with neurotransmitters can improve cognitive function, focus, and mental clarity. Rejuvenate CBD Gummies can support optimal brain performance, aiding in concentration and productivity.
  5. Immune System Support: CBD has demonstrated promise as an immune system booster, one that can assist the body in protecting itself against infectious agents and in preserving overall health. You may find that including Rejuvenate CBD Gummies into your existing wellness routine is beneficial.

Choosing Rejuvenate CBD Gummies for Your Wellness Journey

It is absolutely necessary to place a high level of importance on quality and openness while selecting Rejuvenate CBD Gummies. Look for goods that come from trustworthy producers, have been tested in an independent lab to ensure their potency and purity, and include information that is understandable regarding the amount of CBD they contain. In addition, take into consideration your unique requirements and discuss the matter with a qualified medical practitioner in order to establish the proper dosage and use.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2020 StarkJournal
Maintained & Operated by Marketing 180